Free Newsletter
Reviews, previews, more.
Premiere Mobile Text Alerts
News, events, releases. More info.
(Begin with "1". Example: 12125551234)
RSS Feeds
Site Search
Advanced Search
Reviews Coming Soon DVD Reviews Features Daily News Forums Galleries Video
  « Previous More Features (Article 369 of 725) Next »  
Page 2 of 2
[printer friendly] [email to a friend]
  
Peter Jackson vs. New Line

Peter Jackson
RELATED ARTICLES:
Lord of the Rings quiz
• Inside King Kong
• Four Hobbits Walk into a Bar
Lord of the Rings by the numbers
Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
• Viggo Mortensen: The Hero Returns

"Bizarre." That's how director James Cameron refers to New Line's reluctance to submit to the audit (Cameron will be shooting his Avatar at Jackson's elaborate filmmaking facility, which Jackson paid for with his Rings money, in Wellington, New Zealand, this summer). Cameron adds that Fox, the company with which he's had a 20-year history, "has always been very transparent financially. It's almost automatic that you do an audit." Admitting that he's speaking out of turn, Cameron intimates that the easiest explanation for New Line's behavior is that it has something to hide. But when you factor in how much money could be made on The Hobbit and another prequel (there's a span of about 60 years between the book and Rings, which I'd imagine Jackson would have a field day fleshing out), we're talking about hundreds of millions of potential profit, if the previous films are any indication.


<< Back    1  2